Smith River Pesticide Presentation Now Available on YouTube

Our presentation on pesticide use at the Smith River estuary is now up on YouTube. Check it out here. The pesticide saga begins at about the 14 minute mark, preceded by a walk up and down the wonderful Smith River watershed.

Important Del Norte Supervisors Meeting Tuesday May 26th


The meeting begins at 10, not 9.

Please attend the Del Norte County Board of Supervisors meeting next Tuesday, May 26 at 10 a.m. to hear a presentation by the state Water Board on toxicity at the estuary, and you add your voice for a clean and healthy Smith River, from headwaters to the estuary! Below is a half-page ad that will run in the Del Norte Triplicate this weekend.

Letters and emails are also good. Click here for addresses.

At this writing there is no specific time when the state Water Board will give its presentation on Tuesday. General meeting begins at 9, however. For a more specific time keep checking for the posting at the above link.

Hope to see you there!


The New Wikipedia Page on Easter Lilies

Click here for the expanded story.

The Many New Fans of the Smith River Estuary

We’ve been overwhelmed by the concern and support shown for the Smith River estuary, coming from all parts of the West. Combined with a great turnout (more than 100 people) for our presentation at HSU April 2, I’d say we have a constituency for change. Thanks to all.

Soon we will link to a professional film of the presentation being created by Mahalo Video (

Meanwhile, many people have asked what they can do. Pressure on agencies charged with enforcing laws to protect the Smith River estuary, and the people of the town of Smith River, is a good start. Here is a screen shot from the presentation. For some of these sources you may have to dig for additional info or scamper up the chain of command. Let us know what you find out: And thanks.

More soon.


See the Smith River, and Easter Lily Pesticide Issues, at HSU April 2

Hope you can make it! 6:30 April 2, Kate Buchanan Room, Humboldt State University.


California Pesticide Agency Gives Phony Award to Easter Lily Farmers for “Reducing” Pesticide Use When the Agency’s Own Numbers Show a Dramatic Increase In Pesticides

PRESS RELEASE   March 19, 2015

In one of the most Orwellian displays of deference to industry ever shown by a California state agency, the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) will today give Easter lily farmers an “Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Innovator Award” for allegedly reducing pesticide use “by about 50 percent over the last 20 years.”

Statistics provided on DPR’s own web site not only show no decrease in pesticide use on lily fields in Del Norte County, California, but actually show that lily farmers have increased pesticide use by 65 percent in that time period. The award also flies in the face of recent revelations by another state agency, the California North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board, that pesticides are causing severe toxicity in streams that feed the estuary of the Smith River.

The Smith is California’s wildest and cleanest river, and is considered to be one of the most important streams on the West Coast for protecting endangered salmon and steelhead. This is especially true for coho salmon, which are disappearing throughout the state. Coho can spend a year longer than other salmonids in fresh water, often in estuaries.

Ninety-five percent of Easter lily bulbs used in North America are grown on the Smith River Plain, which surrounds the Smith River estuary.

Easter lily growers use approximately 300,000 pounds of pesticides annually, including California’s highest per-acre applications of the fumigants 1,3-dichloropropene and metam sodium. Other highly toxic pesticides used adjacent to the Smith River estuary include chlorothalonil, diuron, disulfoton, phorate, ethoprop, and maneb.

“‘Appalled’ isn’t a strong enough word for how we feel about this ‘award,’” said Greg King, Executive director of Siskiyou Land Conservancy, which has worked since 2004 to reduce pesticide use on Easter lily fields. “Not only has pesticide use jumped dramatically in the twenty-year period cited by DPR, but recent water testing results show that Easter lily pesticides are contaminating California’s most important remaining salmonid habitat. But maybe what’s most amazing is that DPR’s own numbers directly contradict the press release. It’s flabbergasting.”

DPR claims that that the Easter Lily Research Foundation “has adopted a number of practices to reduce their pesticide use by about 50 percent over the last 20 years.” Actually, Easter lily pesticide use increased from about 180,000 pounds in 1992 to 297,000 pounds in 2012 (the latest year that numbers are available), an increase of 65 percent in the exact 20-year period cited by DPR. Moreover, these numbers come from DPR’s own web site.

DPR also contends that Easter lily growers are “developing a strategy … to control nematodes while reducing the use of fumigants.” Yet the dramatic increase of pesticides from 1992 to 2012 came almost entirely in the form of toxic fumigants.

In 2012 lily growers applied 115,930 pounds of 1,3-dichloropropene and 131,913 pounds of metam sodium (the chemical that, in 1991, spilled into the Sacramento River, killing everything for 40 stream miles before diluting in Lake Shasta). These are both highly toxic, carcinogenic fumigants that disrupt reproduction in many species, including salmon but also humans. Both pesticides have seen dramatic increases on Easter lily fields over the past 20 years, and especially during the past 10 years.

DPR also claims that lily growers’ “approaches often involve huge commitments of time, research and a determination to effectively control pests without harming the environment.” But the harm is now well documented. Last year the state Water Board revealed that its testing of surface waters feeding the Smith River estuary, and which run through lily fields, show “acute (and) chronic reproductive toxicity,” meaning that invertebrates that make up the basis of the salmonid food chain cannot survive or reproduce in that water. The Water Board also found 10 different pesticides in the water. It was the fourth time since the mid-1980s that the Water Board had discovered significant pesticide contamination in the ground- and surface waters of the Smith River estuary.

The Smith River contains the most viable coho salmon population in the California. It is considered a “core watershed” for coho and other species, meaning that recovery of the species in other California streams may hinge on making sure that the Smith River remains healthy.

Pesticides are also known to affect human health. For many years residents of the town of Smith River, which is surrounded by Easter lily fields, have complained of birth defects, miscarriages, skin diseases, respiratory and vision problems, and cancer that they attribute to the massive pesticide use virtually in their back yards.

#          #          #

Update: We called the Department of Pesticide Regulation to complain about these glaring errors and the bogus award, and spoke with DPR Senior Environmental Scientist Mark Robertson, who said he would check it out. Two hours later Robertson phoned and emailed to say that DPR had made an “error” in writing the press release. Here’s Robertson’s email:

Dear Mr. King, Thank you for your inquiry this morning about the 2014 Innovator Award press release. You are correct that there has not been a 50% reduction in pesticides use in Easter lily production over the past 20 years. The error in the press release has been corrected. The error was caused by the inadvertent condensation of two unrelated sentences from the organization description that was used as the basis for the press release. Unfortunately, though I and several other people reviewed the press release, no one here caught the error. Thank you for contacting me so that we could correct the press release in a timely manner.

Record Funding Demonstrates Widespread Support for Protecting Smith River Estuary

Aerial photo from a 2014 report by the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board illustrating contamination of streams that feed the Smith River estuary after running through Easter lily fields. Four of these six sample sites turned up "acute (and) chronic reproductive toxicity."

Aerial photo from a 2014 report by the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board showing contamination of streams that feed the Smith River estuary after running through Easter lily fields. Four of these six sample sites turned up “acute (and) chronic reproductive toxicity.”

Often a non-profit organization will put out a fundraising plea asking supporters to “match” a certain major contribution. It’s usually wishful thinking. After Siskiyou Land Conservancy received a $25,000 grant from the San Francisco-based Lisa and Douglas Goldman Fund, late last year, for our work to reduce pesticide use at the Smith River estuary, we wrote in our annual mailer, “With this mailing we are hoping you can help us to match the Goldman grant to ensure that our campaign to protect the Smith River estuary can thrive during the coming year.”

Imagine our shock and delight when our 2014 winter mailer brought in $25,150! Wow. We are honored and amazed.

We don’t normally talk about money. To us, funding is a tool that allows us to do our work. There is almost never enough of it, and we appreciate every dollar. But the unprecedented response from our supporters to protect the Smith River estuary from agricultural toxins deserves notice. We hear you, and we’re on it. 2015 will be the year of pesticide reduction. No, it’s not guaranteed, but there’s a far greater chance of it now than there was one month ago, thanks to you.

If you would like to be on our snail mail or email list please send your information to: Thanks!


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.